Coming soon

The LA Benchmark. How does your architecture compare?

Aggregated, anonymized data on decision-system health across industries and organization sizes. The first reference point for what "healthy leadership architecture" looks like at your stage.

TL;DR
  • What: aggregated, anonymized LAI distributions and DCD × ACE quadrants across industries and org sizes.
  • Source: data from organizations that completed LA Fit or LA OS, with explicit consent for anonymized inclusion.
  • Updated yearly once first cohort publishes.
  • Today: coming soon — join the waitlist to get the first release.

Where most teams sit on the matrix.

The fit between your organization’s decision-coordination demand (DCDI) and your current architecture capability (LAI) determines whether your leadership system can handle your complexity.

Low DemandModerate DemandHigh Demand
High
Capability
Structured SimplicityScalable ExecutionScalable Execution
Moderate
Capability
Founder ControlArchitecture StressStructural Chaos
Low
Capability
Founder ControlStructural ChaosStructural Chaos

Updated yearly once first cohort publishes.

The five archetypes.

Each cell on the matrix corresponds to one of five operating archetypes.

Structured Simplicity

Your architecture is stronger than your current complexity demands. This is a stable, efficient state — leverage it as a platform to scale.

Founder Control

Low organizational demand allows informal, founder-driven decision making to work. Effective early-stage, but creates scaling risk as complexity grows.

Architecture Stress

Moderate capability is being stretched by moderate demand. Structural gaps are manageable but accumulating — investment in clarity is needed before scaling.

Structural Chaos

Even moderate organizational complexity exceeds low architecture capability. Decision failures are frequent and execution is unreliable.

Scalable Execution

High architecture capability is handling high demand effectively. This is the target state for complex, high-growth organizations.

Which dimensions drift fastest.

The dimension-level decay rate as organizations scale past their first redesign. Higher percentages = faster drift, higher need for Governance Maintenance cadence.

Decision ClarityDC
72%
Escalation DisciplineED
64%
Leadership Load BalanceLLB
51%
Role Ownership & AccountabilityROA
38%
Execution AlignmentEA
29%

Sample data. Indicative direction, not a finalized measurement.

Methodology.

All benchmark data is aggregated and anonymized. We use only data from organizations that have completed the LA Fit or LA OS, with explicit consent for anonymized inclusion. Source data is normalized by organization size, industry, and stage to make cross-sample comparisons valid.

Join the waitlist.

We'll email when the first benchmark publishes. No marketing.

We process this email per our Privacy Notice.

Aggregated Benchmark Data is owned by Team Azimut SRL. Client data remains the client's. Anonymized inclusion in the benchmark requires explicit consent per our standard agreements.